“Fresh insights about the life of the 20th century’s most celebrated female art collector.”
Directed by – LISA IMMORDINO
Produced by – STANLEY BUCHTHAL, DAVID KOH and DAN BRAUN
Featuring artists Samuel Beckett, Max Ernest, Jackson Pollock, Alexander Calder, Marcel Duchamp; plus interviews with Robert De Niro, Marina Abramović, Hans Ulrich Obr, Jeffrey Deitch and many more
2015 TRIBECA FILM FESTIVAL – Official Selection
2015 AFI DOCS FESTIVAL – Official Selection
2015 TELLURIDE FILM FESTIVAL – Official Selection
Peggy Guggenheim: Art Addict, Film Poster. Left: Courtesy of the Peggy Gugggenheim Collection Archives, Venice. Right: Courtesy of the Peggy Guggenheim Collection Archives, Venice.
New York, NY – Submarine Deluxe Entertainment are pleased to announce that Peggy Guggenheim: Art Addict, the unbelievable true story of one of the most colorful figures in modern art, will be available February 14, 2016, on iTunes.
A colorful character who was not only ahead of her time but helped to define it, Peggy Guggenheim was an heiress to her family fortune who became a central figure in the modern art movement. As she moved through the cultural upheaval of the 20th century, she collected not only art, but artists. Her colorful personal history included such figures as Samuel Beckett, Max Ernest, Jackson Pollock, Alexander Calder, Marcel Duchamp as well as countless others. While fighting through personal tragedy, she maintained her vision to build on of the most important collections of modern art, now enshrined in her Venetian palazzo.
“A name-dropper’s Nirvana… Peggy Guggenheim knew everyone in 20th-century art – many of them intimately.”
“A sleek, entertaining portrait”
New York Times – (Critics Pick)
A CONVERSATION WITH LISA IMMORDINO VREELAND, DIRECTOR OF
PEGGY GUGGENHEIM: ART ADDICT
What is your personal connection to Peggy Guggenheim?
Lisa Immordino Vreeland: As an art history major I was always interested in Peggy. I’d read her autobiography, Out of This Century, when I was at school and found her to be this very courageous woman who decided she really wanted to do something with her life at the late age of 40. At a young age she wasn’t happy within the confines of her own traditional family and wanted to step out from that, so her desire for transformation was very interesting to me. There was a lot of sadness in her life, but she was able to find real definition by throwing herself into the avant-garde circles of artists and finding a real purpose for her life, which I found very inspiring.
The movie is framed around a lost interview with Peggy conducted late in her life. How did you acquire these tapes?
LIV: We optioned Jacqueline Bogard Weld’s book, Peggy: The Wayward Guggenheim, the only authorized biography of Peggy, which was published after she died. Jackie had spent two summers interviewing Peggy, but at a certain point lost the tapes somewhere in her Park Avenue apartment. Jackie had so much access to Peggy, which was incredible, but it was also the access that she had to other people who had known Peggy – she interviewed over 200 people for her book. Jackie was incredibly generous, letting me go through all her original research except for the lost tapes. We’d walk into different rooms in her apartment and I’d suggestively open a closet door and ask “Where do you think those tapes might be?” Then one day I asked if she had a basement, and she did. So I went through all these boxes down there, organizing her affairs. Then bingo, the tapes showed up in this shoebox. It was the longest interview Peggy had ever done and it became the framework for our movie. There’s nothing more powerful than when you have someone’s real voice telling the story, and Jackie was especially good at asking provoking questions. You can tell it was hard for Peggy to answer a lot of them, because she wasn’t someone who was especially expressive; she didn’t have a lot of emotion. And this comes across in the movie, in the tone of her voice.
Had you never found the tapes, what would your documentary have consisted of?
LIV: So many different things have been written about Peggy – there were hundreds of articles written about her during her lifetime. She also kept beautiful scrapbooks of articles written about her, which are now in the archives of the Guggenheim Museum. She also wrote her own autobiography and there have been several biographies written on her. So the film was always going to be an accumulation of all these different resources.
What are some of Peggy Guggenheim’s qualities that made you feel she was a worthy subject of a documentary feature?
LIV: Her courageousness above all; if you look at her historically, she was in the middle of World War II living in Paris and collecting art until the very last minute. I also love stories about people who are trying to reinvent themselves in order to find a deeper purpose in their lives. Peggy grew up in a very traditional family of German Bavarian Jews who had moved to New York City in the 19th century. They lived very much like the Rockefellers. Already at a young age Peggy felt like there were too many rules around her and she wanted to break out. That alone was something attractive to me – the notion that she knew that she didn’t fit in to her family or her times. She also came of age during a period of history that is a particular favorite of mine. She was in Paris of the ’20s, the most exciting place to be, culturally, among the Dadaists and the Surrealists. The art historian John Richardson, who is a subject in the film, uses the word pollinator to describe Peggy, and that’s precisely what she was, finding herself in these extraordinary circumstances and helping all these artists that she meets, which was a very unique position to be in. For me, Peggy was all about thinking one step ahead in everything she endeavored. And in the end it was also all about the art – the fact that art became her motivating factor in life.
The Guardian described your previous feature, Diana Vreeland: The Eye Has To Travel, as “a fascinating glimpse into the life of an unconventional woman as well as a brief canter through the history of the 20th century” – indeed, Vreeland and Guggenheim were born and died within ten years of each other. Did you see an immediate comparison in these two women?
LIV: Their personalities are very different. They were both rebels, and I like the idea of being a rebel. Both women were from traditional families and decided they wanted to make their own rules. Mrs. Vreeland was a happy person while Peggy was more subdued. I think Mrs. Vreeland was totally visionary – she would say ordinary things that had so many different meanings, and that’s the reason why she’s so influential today, especially in the world of fashion. Peggy was also visionary but emotionally she was not as alive. Like its predecessor, the 20th century is a main character in the film but it’s shown very differently here. This film is rich with the lives of the most important artists of the time – and Peggy is in the center of the action.
“She was a feminist without realizing it” is how you described Diana Vreeland in the same Guardian interview. Would you say the same thing about Peggy Guggenheim?
LIV: Definitely – but Peggy wouldn’t have defined herself as a feminist. Both she and Mrs. Vreeland were very traditional in the way they were brought up. In Peggy’s case, once she decided she needed a purpose in life, she created a certain trajectory for herself and eventually she was doing exactly what she wanted to do. But it was never with the idea of I want to be a feminist, or this is what I stand for – it was more out of this desire to help the artists and to find a real purpose in her own life. She always had in mind the idea of creating a collection that people could see, and this was her idea of being able to give back to others. She wanted to share this collection, and when she finally got to Venice and made a home for herself and her collection, that was in her way a victory.
This is your second film. Can you talk about the process of putting this one together and how it differed from its predecessor?
LIV: The most challenging thing about this one was the vast amount of material we had at our disposal. We had a lot of media to go through – instead of fashion spreads, which informed The Eye Has To Travel, we had art, which was fantastic. I was spoiled by the access we had to these incredible archives and footage. I’m still new to this, but it’s the storytelling aspect that I loved in both projects. One thing about Peggy that Mrs. Vreeland didn’t have was a very tragic personal life. There was so much that happened in Peggy’s life before you even got to what she actually accomplished. And so we had to tell a very dense story about her childhood, her father dying on the Titanic, her beloved sister dying – the tragic events that fundamentally shaped her in a way. It was about making sure we had enough of the personal story to go along with her later accomplishments. World War II alone was such a huge part of her story, opening an important art gallery in London, where she showed Kandinsky and other important artists for the first time. The amount of material to distill was a tremendous challenge and I hope we made the right choices.
Your sources in the movie are an eclectic group hailing from all over the world and spanning multiple fields, eras and disciplines. How did you go about building your list of sources?
LIV: It was a real team effort. There were certain obvious people, like those within the Guggenheim Museum and Philip Rylands, the Director of the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice, and of course Jackie Weld who wrote the only “authorized” biography on Peggy. They are the ones who helped us validate the story. We focused on trying to rely on her friends to tell more personal aspects of her story and then art historians, gallery owners and museum directors to talk about her legacy. John Richardson, the definitive Picasso biographer, plays a very prominent role in the film – he’s telling us a great deal of Peggy’s story, second only to Peggy herself. Finally, we wanted to speak with current art world figures, like Marina Abramovic and Larry Gagosian, because it’s important for people of today to find a point of connection with Peggy. So many people from across the spectrum have been influenced and inspired by the Peggy Guggenheim Collection. It was great to hear what they had to say about it.
Peggy had a gift for being in the right place at the right time, culturally, and her art collection benefited from her astute radar. What do you think made her so prescient and attuned?
LIV: I wonder if it was being prescient or attuned or simply being at the right place at the right time – this is something I’ve questioned. In 1938, when Peggy opened Guggenheim Jeune in London, she was the first person to show certain artists in a certain way. There were of course other galleries, but they weren’t being run in the same fashion. She was smart enough to ask Marcel Duchamp to be her advisor – so she was in tune, and very well connected. She was on the cutting edge of what was going on and I think a lot of this had to do with Peggy being open to the idea of what was new and outrageous. You have to have a certain personality for this; what her childhood had dictated was totally opposite from what she became in life, and being in the right place at the right time helped her maintain a cutting edge throughout her life.
Your documentary is refreshingly frank in its depiction of Peggy’s unapologetic sexuality – she’s described by sources as a nymphomaniac, someone for whom sex and art went hand in hand…
LIV: Her autobiography was scandalous when it came out – and she didn’t even use real names, she used pseudonyms for her numerous partners. Only after publication did she reveal the names of the men she slept with. The fact that she spoke about her sexual life at all was the most outrageous aspect. She was opening herself up to ridicule, but she didn’t care. Peggy was her own person and she felt good in her own skin. But it was definitely unconventional behavior. I think her sexual appetites revealed a lot about finding her own identity. A lot of it was tied to the loss of her father, I think, in addition to her wanting to feel accepted. She was also very adventurous – look at the men she slept with. I mean, come on, they are amazing Samuel Beckett, Yves Tanguy, Marcel Duchamp, and she married Max Ernst. I think it was really ballsy of her to have been so open about her sexuality; this was not something people did back then. So many people are bound by conventional rules but Peggy said no. She grabbed hold of life and she lived it on her own terms.
The title Art Addict underscores Peggy’s voracious appetite, which extended well beyond her sexuality. What do you think drove her or guided her eclectic, international taste for art and culture, which led to her world-class collection?
LIV: Families like Peggy’s had this innate sense of internationalism because they traveled a lot – she had already traveled the world at a young age. She was never attached to New York, and found herself very much at home in Europe, where she found so much freedom in her life. When she had the hunger and drive to move to Paris she set about building a list of artists with the help of Herbert Read. And she later met and cultivated many of those artists. She had her own eye that she developed, which was another very modern thing about her. She was traveling back and forth between so many countries and had homes in different places, which is not something too many women were doing alone during this time. Of course the money gave her the freedom to do this – we have to remember that she inherited $450,000 after her father’s death, even today that’s a huge sum. This helped in ensuring that there were few boundaries in her world, and the world was her oyster. Once she left New York, she developed a kind of drive that became a passion and in the end she really succeeded. But her story is also about loneliness, which also drove her. She had this fundamental sadness, and there was a lot of tragedy in her life. Going to Europe in the ’20s was a way of escaping all the tragedy. She found a new lease on life by identifying with these outlandish artists; it was truly modern in the way she approached life and built her collection.
You go fairly deep into Peggy’s childhood – we learn that she was a depressive child and a worrier who was also mired in tragedy. Art became a way for her to find herself emotionally….
LIV: Art was planted early on in her life and she was passionate about it – but it was Renaissance art that initially inspired her, not the avant-garde works that became such a defining force in her life. During her family trips as a child she traveled all over the world looking at various kinds of art. When she first moved over to Europe she would journey through all these towns in search of one perfect Renaissance painting that had enchanted her as a child. She had a lot of sadness in her life, even after her father’s death. Her husband would beat her, and her sister died in her 20’s and then her daughter died. At the end of her life, I don’t think her sense of loneliness and loss had left her – it was still very much a part of her. But what happened was that art came to fill this huge void in her.
One of her greatest achievements was her gallery space in New York City, Art of This Century, which was unlike anything the art world has seen before or since in the way that it shattered the boundaries of the gallery space that we’ve come to know today – the sterile white cube. She came to be a genius at displaying her collections…
LIV: She was smart with Art of the Century because she hired Frederick Kiesler as a designer of the gallery and once again surrounded herself with the right people, including Howard Putzler, who was already involved with her at Guggenheim Jeune in London. And she was hanging out with all the exiled Surrealists who were living in New York at the time, including her future husband, Max Ernst, who was the real star of that group of artists. With the help of these people, she started showing art in a completely different way that was both informal and approachable. In conventional museums and galleries, art was untouchable on the wall and inside frames. In Peggy’s gallery, art stuck out from the walls; works weren’t confined to frames. Kiesler designed special chairs you could sit in and browse canvases as you would texts in a library. Nothing like this had ever existed in New York before – even today there is nothing like it. She made the gallery into an exciting place where the whole concept of space was transformed. In Venice, the gallery space was also her home. Today, for a variety of reasons, the home aspect of the collection is less emphasized, though you still get a strong sense of Peggy’s home life there. She was bringing art to the public in a bold new way, which I think is a great idea. It’s art for everybody, which is very much a part of today’s dialogue except that fewer people can afford the outlandish museum entry fees.
Larry Gagosian has one of the best descriptions of Peggy in the movie – “she was her own creation.” Would you agree, and if so why?
LIV: She was very much her own creation. When he said that in the interview I had a huge smile on my face. In Peggy’s case it stemmed from a real need to identify and understand herself. I’m not sure she achieved it but she completely recreated herself – she knew that she did not want to be what she was brought up to be. She tried being a mother, but that was not one of her strengths, so art became that place where she could find herself, and then transform herself. Nobody believed in the artists she cultivated and supported – they were outsiders and she was an outsider in the world she was brought up in. So it’s in this way that she became her own great invention. I hope that her humor comes across in the film because she was extremely amusing – this aspect really comes across in her autobiography.
Finally, what do you think is Peggy Guggenheim’s most lasting legacy, beyond her incredible art collection?
LIV: Her courage, and the way she used it to find herself. She had this ballsiness that not many people had, especially women. In her own way she was a feminist and it’s good for women and young girls today to see women who stepped outside the confines of a very traditional family and made something of her life. Peggy’s life did not seem that dreamy until she attached herself to these artists. It was her ability to redefine herself in the end that truly summed her up.
The film is currently available for pre-order: https://itunes.apple.com/us/movie/peggy-guggenheim-art-addict/id1074493725?ls=1